Industries / Security and DevSecOps
Social listening for security platforms
For application security and developer security teams. Review public integration friction and claims about your coverage against the documentation and evidence available. Use AI search visibility to understand how answers describe your product and where buyers need better information.
A question to track
Which application security tools fit a team adding checks to its development workflow?
Evidence to inspect
- Saved answer for a selected prompt and engine
- How your product and alternatives are described
- Cited URLs and current product documentation
Use the source gaps to improve coverage matrices, supported-integration pages and product-scope explanations, then recheck the same prompts. Measure customer outcomes separately.
Explore Prompt UniverseThe decision
What your team needs to decide
Help product and security specialists distinguish an integration obstacle, a coverage question and an allegation that needs investigation. A public report cannot confirm a vulnerability by itself.
Answer engine optimization (AEO)
Keep security recommendations within your actual coverage
AI-assisted shortlists can repeat an outdated coverage or integration claim. Review the saved answer and supporting references so prospective buyers can assess your product against their own requirements.
Read the answer and its cited sources. Check product version, coverage boundaries and supporting references with Ground Truth, then improve coverage matrices, supported-integration pages and product-scope explanations where the evidence leaves a question unanswered.
Recheck the same prompts after the update. Compare how your product is described and which sources are cited. Bring unresolved questions back to the team, and measure visits and customer outcomes separately.
Product-fit signals
What would make the signal useful?
Repeated use within engineering workflows and clear requests for broader team rollout can support an adoption hypothesis. Validate deployment retention, actual coverage and purchasing requirements with customers. Public sentiment is not a security assessment.
Terms in context
A little context before you go deeper.
The terms used on this page, with definitions you can return to.
- Vulnerability
- A weakness that could let someone compromise a system or its data.
- Ground Truth
- A review of product claims against connected documentation and source evidence.
- Friction
- A reported obstacle to using a product, such as a failed setup step or a missing capability.
- Product-market fit
- Evidence that a defined group of customers repeatedly gets enough value from a product to keep using or paying for it.
FAQ
Common questions
Which sources should we start with?
Start with connected public GitHub, Reddit, X, LinkedIn and web sources where your audience discusses the product. Coverage depends on source access and configuration; private conversations are outside this workflow.
What does AI search visibility tell us?
Answer engine optimization (AEO) means improving how useful and accurate your information is in answers. Generative engine optimization (GEO) is a related term used for generated answers. EarShots records selected answers, mentions and cited sources; these do not establish sales, adoption or coverage of every search.
Who reviews and sends a reply?
Ears can prepare documentation-grounded drafts for eligible posts on X, LinkedIn and Reddit. A person reviews the source and draft, then posts in the original thread. Other sources remain evidence to review. Connecting a source does not authorize automatic replies.
Practical guides
Read more about the next step
Choose a guide on reviewing sources, answering questions or measuring AI search visibility.
AI Search & AEO Guides
How to make a website usable by browser agents
Build agent-usable forms with semantic HTML, explicit error states and stable controls. Test task completion separately from Lighthouse audits and WebMCP.
Claude web crawlers: a site owner’s guide
Learn what ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, and Claude-User do, how Anthropic documents robots.txt controls, and how to check crawler access.
Where developers talk about your product in 2026
Plan developer monitoring across GitHub, Reddit and technical forums. Compare channel data without assuming activity counts prove an audience migration.
Related Articles
Five surfaces, an MCP server, a CLI, and services: where EarShots is now
EarShots connects developer listening, product feedback and documentation review with workspace-scoped agent access and human-reviewed drafts.
Introducing EarShots: Developer Signal for Technical Go-to-Market Teams
EarShots listens to developer conversations and AI search answers about your product, sorts what matters and drafts grounded replies and content for a person to approve. Teams and agents can use it through the app, a REST API, an MCP server and a CLI.
Related industries and workflows
Connect listening with AI discovery
Bring your product documentation, audience and a decision you need to make. We can review which public sources and AI search questions fit that brief.